New Delhi:
The issue of triple talaq has once again come under discussion. There was also a strong debate in the Supreme Court on Wednesday. Actually, this debate took place about the petition in which the law of the Central Government has been challenged regarding triple talaq. During this debate, the Supreme Court has sought full details from the government from the Central Government regarding this law. Along with this, three divorces have been asked to tell how many FIR and charge sheet has been done across the country. The Supreme Court while hearing this petition has said that we will test the data. No lawyer can defend the validity of triple talaq system. The court has also said that but the question before us is whether it can be made criminal. Especially when this practice is banned. The court also made it clear that no one can talcate with anyone by speaking a divorce thrice at a time. The next hearing in this case will now be held after March 17. The court has also asked the petitioners to file a written reply in three weeks.
What did CJI say
During the hearing of this case, Chief Justice of India (CJI) Sanjeev Khanna said that the relationship between husband and wife remains, it does not end, the process is a crime. Sikh, Jain, Buddhist etc. come under the Hindu Marriage Act Are. We have legal acts. I do not think any lawyer will support the practice of triple talaq, but the question before us is whether it can be made criminal, whereas this practice is banned and cannot be divorced by saying divorce three times at a time.
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta opposed the petition
During the hearing of the case, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta has opposed all such petitions. He said that triple talaq not only breaks the words, but also the relationship. You say that you are not my wife from the next minute. This is a rare constitutional amendment.
Center has enacted law
Let us tell you that the Supreme Court is currently hearing the petitions challenging the law of the Central Government on triple talaq. The government has made a provision of three years by bringing three divorces under the purview of crime through this law, which various Muslim organizations have challenged in SC. The central government has defended this law by filing answers in the SC. The government says that despite the SC declared triple talaq as unconstitutional, it could not be stopped. Even after the court’s decision, hundreds of three divorce cases have come up across the country. In this case, a law was needed to ensure the SC’s decision to be completely implemented. He has helped stop it.